Macro is impossible to predict – so don’t try

Let’s start with the bit that refrain gets right. The last decade has delivered repeated macro shocks that weren’t in anyone’s base case: a pandemic, multiple energy shocks triggered by wars, and the fastest inflation surge in a generation. Relationships that once looked stable – between growth and inflation, between economic policy and markets, between equities and bonds – have become more unstable.

So, if the claim is that macro is noisy, uncertain, and prone to surprise, I agree.

But the leap from “uncertain” to “unknowable” is where I part company.

Because beneath the noise, there are macro regimes. And regimes matter.

Shocks are becoming structural 

Take inflation. For much of the 2010s, inflation was structurally subdued, allowing central banks to backstop markets with minimal constraint. Today, inflation is more volatile and more sensitive to supply shocks – whether geopolitical, climatic or policy-driven. That changes how central banks react, and in turn how markets price both risky and risk-free assets.

Or take geopolitics. There was a period when investors could plausibly argue that geopolitical events rarely translated into sustained market moves. That looked increasingly tenuous even before the conflict in the Middle East. The reality now is that geopolitics directly affects trade routes, supply chains. energy prices, and ultimately inflation and growth.

Moreover, these repeated shocks are not isolated incidents. They are shifts in the underlying nature of the macro environment, toward persistently elevated geopolitical risk and an increasing preponderance of supply-side shocks.

And it is in analyzing those structural shifts where macro is most important.

I don’t think the real value-add of macro-economists is to predict next quarter’s GDP to one decimal place. It is to identify the range of possible outcomes around key economic variables – growth, inflation, policy – and to understand how those distributions may be shifting over time.

In other words, macro is less about point forecasts, and more about underlying regimes and scenario analysis.

What this means for portfolios

That really matters for portfolios. A world where inflation risks are symmetric around a 2% target is very different from one where inflation is persistently skewed to the upside or downside. And a world where geopolitics is background noise is very different from one where it can close key shipping lanes and disrupt global supply chains.

Ignoring those shifts doesn’t make the risks disappear. It just means you’re not prepared for them.

I also think there is a behavioral element here. Dismissing macro as “unpredictable” can be a convenient way of avoiding uncomfortable uncertainty. It’s easier to focus on company fundamentals than to engage with messy, evolving macro risks.

But investors don’t have that luxury. Macro may be uncertain – but it is also one of the main drivers of the environment in which all assets are priced.

Final thoughts 

So yes, macro is harder than it used to be. Yes, it requires humility. And yes, we won’t always get it right.

But that is not a reason to stop trying.

It is a reason to think about macro differently: less as a forecasting exercise, and more as a framework for understanding risks, regimes, and the range of possible futures that portfolios need to navigate.

Important information

The information contained herein is current at the time of distribution, intended to be of general interest only and does not constitute legal or tax advice. Aberdeen does not warrant the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of the information and materials contained in this document and expressly disclaims liability for errors or omissions in such information and materials. Aberdeen reserves the right to make changes and corrections to its opinions expressed in this document at any time, without notice.

Some of the information in this document may contain projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. These statements are only predictions and actual events or results may differ materially. The reader must make his/her own assessment of the relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information contained in this document and make such independent investigations as he/she may consider necessary or appropriate for the purpose of such assessment.

Any opinion or estimate contained in this document is made on a general basis and is not to be relied on by the reader as advice. Neither Aberdeen nor any of its agents have given any consideration to nor have they made any investigation of the investment objectives, financial situation or particular need of the reader, any specific person or group of persons. Accordingly, no warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of the reader, any person or group of persons acting on any information, opinion or estimate contained in this document.

More from The Witt

Short, incisive perspectives – fresh takes on the issues driving markets today.

Latest articles from The Witt