Key Highlights

  • In light off the tariffs and ongoing negotiations, we anticipate elevated uncertainty and heightened financial market volatility. We are monitoring the situation and will communicate any changes to the real estate Houseview, should the need arise. Please contact a member of the team for more information.
  • Worse-than-expected tariffs imply a negative growth and disinflationary shock for Asia-Pacific (APAC) economies; central banks are likely to ease accordingly.  
  • The contours of our key convictions remain largely unchanged, and bottom-up market/stock selection remains key to investment performance.
  • Japan and Korea remain the top two markets in APAC where we have the highest conviction.       

APAC economic outlook

The global baseline plus the reciprocal tariff regime announced by the US on 2 April exceeded our base case expectations. While there may be scope for the tariffs to fall over time as deals are done with trade partners, it’s also possible that the tariff level keeps rising in the near term as retaliation occurs and as more sector-specific tariffs are announced [1].

The tariffs represent a stagflationary shock to the US economy, pushing down on growth and up on inflation. For the rest of the world, the impact will partly depend on retaliatory measures, but it’s the negative growth shock that’s likely to dominate. Weaker growth and exporters cutting prices to boost demand are likely to impart a disinflationary shock outside the US; central banks will ease accordingly.  

The escalating trade war between the US and China remains a highly fluid situation, with most observers expecting the tariffs to shave 100-200 basis points (bps) off China’s near-term growth. This should translate into a very weak inflation environment and pave the way for more policy easing. Outside of China, initial estimates of the tariffs’ negative impact on near-term economic growth range from 30-50bps for Japan and Australia, to about 100bps for more open economies like Hong Kong and Singapore.    
The heightened uncertainties will likely have implications for the pace of interest rate normalisation by the Bank of Japan, especially as the Japanese yen strengthens given its status as a safe-haven currency. 

We also think recent events may also persuade the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) to pivot to a more dovish stance, despite a relatively limited direct impact on Australia’s economy from the tariffs. As at the time of writing, money markets are now fully priced for a quarter-point easing at each of the RBA’s next three policy meetings starting in May, with more to follow in 2026.     


2024 2025 2026 2027
Real GDP growth (%)
     
China 5.0 4.6 4.2 4.1
Japan 0.1 1.2 0.9 1.0
India 6.6 6.2 6.0 6.0
CPI (average, %)        
China 0.2 0.2 1.2 1.4
Japan 2.5 2.6 1.6 1.5
India 4.9 3.9 5.1 4.8
Policy rate (YE, %)        
China 1.5 1.2 1.1 1.1
Japan 0.3 0.8 1.0  1.3
India 6.5 5.8 5.5 5.5

Source: Aberdeen Investments Global Macro Research; March 2025 
Forecasts are a guide only and actual outcomes could be significantly different.

APAC real estate market overview

Prior to the 2 April announcement, we had expected a ‘K-shaped’ recovery and bifurcation to expand not just between markets but also between different locations and grades within the same sector. While the negative growth shock is likely to dampen the overall leasing demand, tenants’ flight to quality/location will likely continue, especially as negotiating power shifts towards the tenants. 

Japan and Korea have been the markets where we have the highest real estate investment conviction in APAC, and the latest tariffs have not changed that assessment. In fact, we expect incremental investment capital to favour lower-risk core markets like Japan and Korea amid the prevailing uncertainties. A slower pace of interest rate normalisation in Japan and faster policy easing in Korea will also support capital values, even as prospective rental growth slows. Finally, we think there’s also a good chance that tariff rates for both markets could be negotiated lower over time.  

The living sector ranks highly in our investment preferences globally. We believe the investment case remains robust for Tokyo multifamily, despite the potential economic slowdown because of the tariffs. The overall vacancy rate was relatively tight to begin with, and trends underpinning residential leasing demand – such as net migration, improved wage growth and increased female labour participation/dual-income households – will likely endure despite the near-term uncertainties.

Office occupier fundamentals in Tokyo and Seoul are also likely to withstand the near-term negative growth shock, with vacancy rates in both cities among the lowest globally. In Tokyo, while new office supply is scheduled to rise again in 2025, pre-leasing has been healthy for the major developments in the pipeline. Leasing demand for newer buildings is expected to remain robust as companies look to retain talent in a tight labour market. 

While some investors are concerned about the significant new supply that could be delivered from 2028 in Seoul, we think there are potential mitigating factors. Demand for advanced technologies should endure, despite the near-term uncertainties. Korea remains at the forefront of the global technology upcycle, which should, in turn, underpin office space demand over the longer term. 

Outlook for risk and performance

Despite heightened macro uncertainties, we have raised our total return forecasts to chiefly reflect a less bearish outlook in some office markets. In Sydney, for instance, office attendance has improved, while incentives have started to ease. Meanwhile, prices have adjusted ahead of other APAC markets and could begin to attract more investment capital. 
We have also trimmed our projected downside for Greater Chinese commercial properties, even as the near-term outlook remains challenging. While vacancy rates remain high and there is still significant new supply, a more business-friendly environment (coupled with the sharp correction in pricing that has already materialised) could help stabilise these markets sooner than expected.

Overall, our base case of a ‘K-shaped’ recovery envisages not just a wider bifurcation between markets, but also different locations and grades within the same sector. 
Macroeconomic drivers and geopolitical developments will have a significant impact on real estate’s near-term performance. Trade policies remain highly uncertain, which will weigh on business and investment sentiment. There is some scope for trade deals to be made, but the risk of sharply higher tariffs and/or erratic trade barriers is also significant. This could translate into more-cautious-than-expected real estate demand. 

On a more constructive note, elevated construction and financing costs may discourage new starts and defer completions. This could translate into lower downside risks to occupier markets in the medium term. This is especially the case for better-quality assets that benefit from the growing bifurcation in performance. 

APAC total returns from March 2025