But recent market dynamics suggest that investors may want to revisit this underappreciated segment of the region’s equity market and take a closer look (see Chart 1).
Chart 1: European smaller companies lead the pack, 2001- 2025 (%)
Why Now?
One of the biggest stories in global equities this year has been the rotation out of US assets and into European stocks.
US political volatility, the sustainability of government debt levels and questions around future earnings growth in the US have clouded the outlook for American equities and the US dollar. As a result, investors are increasingly turning to Europe – and not just for diversification, but for value.
Yet most of the capital flows have gone into the stocks of larger European companies. That’s understandable, especially for overseas investors who may be less familiar with the nuances of the region. But it may also be a missed opportunity.
Here are four reasons why European smaller companies deserve a closer look:
Valuations that make sense
US equities near record levels and recent political developments are two of the reasons that have prompted investors to reassess whether those valuations are justified.
By contrast, European equities offer exposure to companies trading at significantly cheaper multiples. For example, the MSCI Europe Index trades at 15.8 times 12-months forward earnings (compared to 22.8 times for the S&P 500). This represents a 31% discount.
But the real value lies in many of the region’s overlooked smaller companies. The MSCI Europe Small Cap Index trades at just 14.4 times – a 37% discount to the S&P 500.
In fact, the relative valuation of European smaller companies, compared to their large counterparts, is now lower than it was during the depths of the 2007/8 global financial crisis.
Diversification benefits
Europe’s diverse cultures, political systems and economic profiles offer differentiated returns compared to US or even global equities.
Historically, relative to their larger peers, European smaller companies have demonstrated lower correlation with US and global markets, making them a powerful tool for portfolio diversification.
And while Europe’s lack of a dominant technology sector has often been seen as a drawback, it may now be a strength. Investors who feel overexposed to expensive tech stocks may find European small companies a refreshing alternative.
Domestic growth tailwinds
While it feels like all the headlines have focused on developments in the US, it’s worth remembering that Germany has announced a major spending initiative that is expected to boost European growth.
This could be particularly beneficial for smaller companies, which tend to be more domestically focused and better positioned to benefit from homegrown growth.
In a world of rising tariffs and global trade tensions, high-quality European smaller companies may also offer a degree of shelter from international volatility.
Long-term outperformance
The ‘smaller companies effect’ – the tendency for the shares of smaller firms to outperform over the longer term -- is well documented.
For example, Europe’s smaller companies have outperformed their larger peers by some 3.4% each year since 2001 (see Chart 2).
Chart 2: Smaller companies outperformance (% per annum since 2001)
Relative performance of MSCI Small vs MSCI main index across all regions, annualised difference.
Notably, their strongest period of performance was between 2003 and 2007, which coincided with the last time Europe materially outperformed US stocks.
Why you should care
If you’re already considering European equities, it’s worth asking: ‘are you investing in the right part of the market?’European smaller companies offer compelling valuations, strong diversification benefits and a track record of long-term outperformance.
In today’s volatile investment environment – in which the outlook for US assets looks increasingly uncertain – they may offer a smart way to diversify.
Final thoughts
European smaller companies have quietly outperformed major equity markets over the past two decades. This long-term track record is often overlooked, but it’s especially relevant now as investors reassess their exposure to US assets.Recent political and economic uncertainty in the US has made Europe – and particularly its smaller firms – a more attractive destination for capital. These businesses offer compelling valuations, strong diversification benefits and a unique sensitivity to domestic growth trends.
For investors seeking value and resilience in a shifting global landscape, European smaller companies may offer not just an alternative, but a timely and compelling opportunity.
- 2025 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein: (1) is proprietary to Morningstar and/ori ts content providers; (2) may not be copied or distributed; and (3) is not war-ranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are re-sponsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. For more detailed information about Morningstar's Analyst Rating, including its methodology, please go to: http://corporate.morningstar.com/us/ docu-ments/MethodologyDocuments/AnalystRatingforFundsMethodology.pdf The Morningstar Analyst Rating for Funds is a forward-looking analysis of a fund. Morningstar has identified five key areas crucial to predicting the future success of a fund: People, Parent, Process, Performance, and Price. The pillars are used in determining the Morningstar Analyst Rating for a fund. Morningstar Analyst Ratings are assigned on a five-tier scale running from Gold to Negative. The top three rat-ings, Gold, Silver, and Bronze, all indicate that our analysts think highly of a fund; the difference between them corresponds to differences in the level of analyst conviction in a fund’s ability to outperform its benchmark and peers through time, within the context of the level of risk taken over the long term. Neutral represents funds in which our analysts don’t have a strong positive or negative conviction over the long term and Negative represents funds that possess at least one flaw that our analysts believe is likely to significantly hamper future performance over the long term. Long term is defined as a full market cycle or at least five years. Past performance of a se-curity may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For de-tailed information about the Morningstar Analyst Rating for Funds, please visit http://global.morningstar.com/manager disclosures.